I met my husband before the dating apps, and it's been decades since I was dating people, so this is in no way dating advice. I don't presume to have tips for relationships so read it more as an observation on how the world has changed, and how that might be in fact the problem with meeting compatible people or long term partners.
I was discussing with a friend my alarm at how the always accommodating companion chatbots would ruin any chance of real relationships progressing, because humans and messy emotionally and relationships require compromise in many ways, and people are now being trained by AI to find that a deal breaker, or at best possibly too much effort. She said 'That's already sort of happening. On the apps, people aren't interested unless you match 100% or they seem to lose interest quickly if you have a different hobby or different interests.". I thought back to the book Modern Romance (Aziz Ansari 2016 which I thought I wrote about but can't find the post). This was touched on back then, and it seems nothing much has changed.
I was talking about it later with my husband and he pointed out we wouldn't match on the apps today - he probably wouldn't even see my profile, let alone be interested in what I listed as my interests (nor me his). I would be looking for someone that likes books and music and festivals, and he would list running and scuba diving etc. What would be the appeal of pursuing an obvious 'mismatch' when there are a million other people out there that might fit the bill?
If AI can give you a companion that likes every thing you say, builds up your self-esteem and allows you to indulge in your interests 100% of the time or even choose the movie every night, wouldn't a real person that suggests an alternative show some nights seem like a pain?
In the book Modern Romance, the solution suggested to this flaw in the algorithm was to just go and meet them - 5 minutes with a person will give you an answer that 5 weeks chatting online won't. As for getting matches on apps that aren't your exact mirror? I don't know how you do that. But maybe you need to try. Maybe it's the difference in us that gives a couple growth and allows them to stick together as they evolve?
If my husband and I were the same people we were when we met 30 something years ago, we'd be pretty pathetic humans and have lived a ridiculously sheltered life. Maybe a relationship is finding a path you are both happy to walk together, even if the shared path is different to your own path at times? Who wants to be two stagnant peas in a pod?
Obviously, there has to be enough in common and shared values (and physical attraction) but don't let the apps limit your idea of a partner and don't let AI become the easy way out.





















